> Uh, why are we not just replacing the old script and allowing git to
> preserve the old version?
The idea was to be able to run the old version now and then, especially before
releasing, to make sure we haven't lost anything with the new script.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Nikhil Sontakke | Date: 2011-03-10 11:44:48 |
| Subject: Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13 |
| Previous: | From: Martijn van Oosterhout | Date: 2011-03-10 08:20:28 |
| Subject: Re: FuncExpr.collid/OpExpr.collid unworkably servingdouble duty |
pgsql-committers by date
| Next: | From: Robert Haas | Date: 2011-03-10 14:00:11 |
| Subject: pgsql: Replication README updates. |
| Previous: | From: Heikki Linnakangas | Date: 2011-03-10 07:07:13 |
| Subject: pgsql: Fix bugs in the isolation tester flex rules. |