Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous standbys?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous standbys?
Date: 2011-02-24 03:25:49
Message-ID: 20110224.122549.550118873833919206.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> there could be only one standby at the same time...
> in the original patch there could be several synchronous standby
> servers and the primary was going to wait until the first one of them
> to answer, but that was removed and replaced by a list of possible
> synch standby servers and the first that connects is the one the
> primary will wait for. because right now it's a simple list the first
> one will always be the synch standby until it's removed from the list
> or phisically.
> 
> the other comment in the doc should be removed

Thanks for the info!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-02-24 03:30:08
Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-24 03:14:47
Subject: Re: Possible substitute for PostmasterIsAlive polling loops

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group