> there could be only one standby at the same time...
> in the original patch there could be several synchronous standby
> servers and the primary was going to wait until the first one of them
> to answer, but that was removed and replaced by a list of possible
> synch standby servers and the first that connects is the one the
> primary will wait for. because right now it's a simple list the first
> one will always be the synch standby until it's removed from the list
> or phisically.
> the other comment in the doc should be removed
Thanks for the info!
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2011-02-24 03:30:08|
|Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-24 03:14:47|
|Subject: Re: Possible substitute for PostmasterIsAlive polling loops|