Re: Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change pg_last_xlog_receive_location not to move backwards
Date: 2011-02-12 15:49:13
Message-ID: 20110212154913.GD4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> I think a big part of the problem here is that we have wildly
> inconsistent terminology for no especially good reason.

Agreed.

> Thoughts, comments?

I thought about this for a bit and agree w/ your suggestions.

So, +1 from me.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2011-02-12 15:53:33 Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-02-12 15:45:09 Re: ALTER TYPE 2: skip already-provable no-work rewrites