| From: | Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Date: | 2011-02-09 19:16:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20110209191635.GL51377@timac.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:40:38AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 01:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >Well, the question seems to be whether or not it's a reasonable
> >price to pay. On the whole I'm inclined to think it is, especially
> >when it can be avoided by updating your code, which will be a
> >saving in fragility and complexity as well.
>
> do you till have concerns about this, or are you happy for us to
> move ahead on it?
[I'm not really paying close enough attention for you to put much weight
on my opinions, but...]
I can't see any major issues so I'm happy for you to move ahead.
Thanks!
Tim.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2011-02-09 19:28:21 | Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] |
| Previous Message | A.M. | 2011-02-09 19:16:18 | Re: SSI patch version 14 |