On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:40:38AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 01:20 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Well, the question seems to be whether or not it's a reasonable
> >price to pay. On the whole I'm inclined to think it is, especially
> >when it can be avoided by updating your code, which will be a
> >saving in fragility and complexity as well.
> do you till have concerns about this, or are you happy for us to
> move ahead on it?
[I'm not really paying close enough attention for you to put much weight
on my opinions, but...]
I can't see any major issues so I'm happy for you to move ahead.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alex Hunsaker||Date: 2011-02-09 19:28:21|
|Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: A.M.||Date: 2011-02-09 19:16:18|
|Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14|