On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:09:48PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we don't allocate all the memory up front, does that allow memory
> to be dynamically shared between different hash tables in shared
> memory? I'm thinking not, but...
> Frankly, I think this is an example of how our current shared memory
> model is a piece of garbage.
What other model(s) might work better?
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-02-09 15:21:37|
|Subject: Re: SSI patch version 14|
|Previous:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-02-09 15:07:42|
|Subject: Re: Extensions versus pg_upgrade|