Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences
Date: 2011-01-19 17:07:24
Message-ID: 201101191707.p0JH7O302865@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Chris Browne wrote:
> gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com (A B) writes:
> > If you just wanted PostgreSQL to go as fast as possible WITHOUT any
> > care for your data (you accept 100% dataloss and datacorruption if any
> > error should occur), what settings should you use then?
>
> Use /dev/null. It is web scale, and there are good tutorials.
>
> But seriously, there *are* cases where "blind speed" is of use. When
> loading data into a fresh database is a good time for this; if things
> fall over, it may be pretty acceptable to start "from scratch" with
> mkfs/initdb.
>
> I'd:
> - turn off fsync
> - turn off synchronous commit
> - put as much as possible onto Ramdisk/tmpfs/similar as possible

FYI, we do have a documentation section about how to configure Postgres
for improved performance if you don't care about durability:

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/non-durability.html

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-19 17:26:56 Re: "NOT IN" substantially slower in 9.0.2 than 8.3.13 - NOT EXISTS runs fast in both 8.3.13 and 9.0.2
Previous Message Charles.Hou 2011-01-19 14:54:46 Re: the XID question