Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> > >
> > > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
> > > or awkward, and this diff generated by me attempts to address them.
> > >
> > > I have already updated the documentation proofreading wiki:
> > >
> > > ? ? ? ?http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Documentation_Proofreading
> > I don't think changing "see below" to "refer below" or "call" to
> > "execute" is an improvement; even if we did that uniformly throughout
> > our documentation, surely future editors are going to reuse those
> > phrasings.
> > A lot of these other changes look pretty dubious too, although some
> > seem worthwhile.
> OK, that last part seems kind of vague. ;-) Can you hack up the diff
> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile? You can just remove
> the parts of the diff you don't like.
Robert, here is a unified diff, which I think it easier to review for
single-line documention changes.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2011-01-12 18:27:00|
|Subject: Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-01-12 18:06:59|
|Subject: Re: pg_depend explained |