Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DISCARD ALL ; stored procedures

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DISCARD ALL ; stored procedures
Date: 2011-01-07 15:49:26
Message-ID: 20110107154926.GP4933@tamriel.snowman.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Really it seems to me that changing the search path ought to discard
> anything that might have been done differently had the search path
> been different, but I don't think that's back-patch material.

I like that idea, but I agree it wouldn't be back-patchable, and I could
see arguments against it also (convoluting the GUC mechanics, etc).

> > Making it part of DISCARD PLANS; and back-patching it to 8.3 where
> > DISCARD was introduced would be awesome for me. :)
> 
> I'd need to look at this more closely before committing anything, but
> at first blush I think that's reasonable.  Have a patch?

Sadly, no..  To be honest, I was fully expecting a response of "that's
hard to do."  I'm not sure we have any mechanics in place for throwing
away stored procedure plans, but I'll go look and see if I can come up
with something.  Would *love* to get this fixed.

	Thanks!

		Stephen

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2011-01-07 15:52:51
Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables
Previous:From: Garick HamlinDate: 2011-01-07 15:47:46
Subject: Re: Streaming base backups

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group