Re: wCTE behaviour

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 01:33:39PM -0500, Greg Smith wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> >This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
> >CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the
> >edges and needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here
> >anyway.
> >
> >This patch passes all regression tests, but feel free to try to
> >break it, there are probably ways to do that. This one also has
> >the "always run DMLs to completion, and exactly once" behaviour.
>
> So this patch was marked "Ready for Committer", but a) no committer
> has picked it up yet and b) Marko has made changes here that nobody
> else has tested out yet that I've seen on the last. Accordingly,
> that classification may have been optimistic. It seems to me that
> another testing run-through from someone like David might be
> appropriate to build some confidence this latest patch should be a
> commit candidate. If there is a committer intending to work on this
> as-is, they haven't identified themselves.

I've tested this one and not managed to break it. One thing it could
use is support for EXPLAIN ANALYZE.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate