On Thursday 02 December 2010 00:48:53 Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 October 2010 16:18:29 Kevin Grittner wrote:
> >> For SSI purposes, it would be highly desirable to be able to set
> >> the SQLSTATE and message generated when the canceled transaction
> >> terminates.
> > Ok, I implemented that capability, but the patch feels somewhat
> > wrong to me,
> > so its a separate patch on top the others:
> The patch is in context diff format, applies with minor offsets,
> compiles and passes regression tests.
> I have to admit that after reading the patch, I think I previously
> misunderstood the scope of it. Am I correct in reading that the
> main thrust of this is to improve error handling on standbys? Is
> there any provision for one backend to cause a *different* backend
> which is idle in a transaction to terminate cleanly when it attempts
> to process its next statement? (That is what I was hoping to find,
> for use in the SSI patch.)
Do you wan't to terminate it immediately or on next statement?
You might want to check out SendProcSignal() et al.
> Anyway, if the third patch file is only there because of my request,
> I think it might be best to focus on the first two as a solution for
> the standby issues this was originally meant to address, and then to
> look at an API for the usage I have in mind after that is settled.
Besides that I dont like the implementation very much, I think its generally a
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-12-02 17:37:13|
|Subject: Re: twitter_fdw-0.1|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-12-02 14:37:37|
|Subject: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three|