On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 02:52:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, temp tables really want a separate set of XIDs with a separate
> CLOG, too. Admittedly, they don't necessarily need WAL, if you can
> make them work without catalog entries, but that's not so easy either.
At one point there was the idea to have a sort of permanent temporary
tables which would have a pg_class entry but each session would have
its own copy. Replicated slaves would then also be able to use this
Doesn't help with the XIDs though.
Have a nice day,
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patriotism is when love of your own people comes first; nationalism,
> when hate for people other than your own comes first.
> - Charles de Gaulle
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-19 19:03:10|
|Subject: Re: Creation of temporary tables on read-only standby servers|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-10-19 19:00:24|
|Subject: Re: max_wal_senders must die|