From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: repository size differences |
Date: | 2010-09-22 02:32:57 |
Message-ID: | 20100922023257.GA15743@toroid.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 2010-09-21 17:53:22 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know offhand why the sizes are so different?
>
> Magnus did
> git gc --aggressive --prune
> during the conversion. I imagine it's the --aggressive that does it.
That's not it. I ran the same git gc command on my old repository, and
it didn't make any difference to the size. (I didn't try with a larger
window size, though.)
Oh well, it's probably just some problem with the older conversion, and
doesn't matter now. The number of commits ("git rev-list --all|wc -l")
is broadly similar (36848 old, 35978 new), as is the number of packed
objects (~383k old, ~387k new).
I'm certainly not complaining about git clone being twice as fast. :-)
-- ams
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-09-22 02:33:47 | Re: Make tuples_per_page pr. table configureable. |
Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-09-22 02:21:01 | Re: wip: functions median and percentile |