Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> However, that's something for 9.1 and beyond. Bruce's immediate problem
> >> is what to do in pg_upgrade in 9.0, and there I concur that he should
> >> duplicate what pg_regress is doing.
> > OK, here is a patch that sets all the variables that pg_regress.c sets.
> I certainly hope that pg_regress isn't freeing the strings it passes
> to putenv() ...
pg_regress does not restore these settings (it says with C/English) so
the code is different.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-02 00:08:47|
|Subject: Re: Fix for pg_upgrade's forcing pg_controldata into English |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-09-01 23:55:45|
|Subject: Re: compiling with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE doesn't pass regression |