| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering |
| Date: | 2010-08-20 19:54:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20100820195426.GJ26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* David E. Wheeler (david(at)kineticode(dot)com) wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>
> > +1 for Tom's post.
> >
> > 20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> şunları yazdı:
> >
> >> .0 is for releases, not betas. I see no need for an extra number in
> >> beta versions.
>
> Yes, well, it's still implicit, isn't it?
It's still useless garbage.. Sorry, I'm w/ Tom on this one.
THanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-20 19:59:05 | Re: Deadlock bug |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-20 19:50:13 | Re: COPY FROM/TO losing a single byte of a multibyte UTF-8 sequence |