Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Versioning policy and pg_upgrade
Date: 2010-08-17 00:46:15
Message-ID: 201008170046.o7H0kGG20551@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> > But I propose expanding it to read:
>
> > "Major releases usually change the internal format of system tables
> > and data files. These changes are often complex, so we don't maintain
> > backward compatibility for data files. A dump/reload of the database
> > cluster is required for major upgrades for upgrading from 8.2 or
> > earlier. For upgrading from version 8.3 and later, there is the
> > option to use pg_upgrade (also known as pg_migrator prior to version
> > 9.0), capable of in-place upgrades. This means, for example, you can
> > upgrade any minor version of 8.3 to 8.4 without having to perform a
> > full backup and restore, resulting in a significantly faster upgrade."
>
> > Too wordy?
>
> I don't really think that pg_upgrade should be recommended for 8.3 to
> 8.4 upgrades. There are too many limitations and it's not been well
> tested. I don't even trust it very much yet for 8.4 to 9.0 updates...

Hey, I heard that! ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2010-08-17 00:48:26 Re: (news.postgresql.org) pgsql.hackers and pgsql.performance not updating
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-08-17 00:42:50 Re: (news.postgresql.org) pgsql.hackers and pgsql.performance not updating