Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_upgrade test

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>
Cc: pgsql-testers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test
Date: 2010-08-15 18:36:04
Message-ID: 201008151836.o7FIa4U23308@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-testers
Mario Splivalo wrote:
> [TEST REPORT]
> [Release]: 9.0Beta4
> [Test Type]: Feature test
> [Test]: pg_upgrade
> [Platform]: Ubuntu 10.04 64bit
> [Parameters]: Default
> [Failure]: No
> [Results]: pg_upgrade successful
> 
> 
> I run the test on the 6 GB cluster consisting of 6 databases.
> The 'old style' test (pg_dumpall / pg_restore) took around 26 minutes.
> Doing `pg_dump -Fc f` for each database, then recreating databases and 
> users on new (9.0b4) cluster, and then pg_restoring databases took 15 
> minutes. (Too bad one can't pg_dumpall -Fc).
> 
> Using pg_upgrade the migration took 5 minutes, including 'vacuumdb -aZ'.
> Great tool!

Great, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

pgsql-testers by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-08-16 06:44:34
Subject: Re: vacuum in pg9beta4 much slower than in 8.4
Previous:From: Mario SplivaloDate: 2010-08-15 18:22:10
Subject: pg_upgrade test

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group