* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against
> >> pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
> > ISTM this bug should be on the open items list...
> I don't think this is a bug.
Agreed, and it's certainly not something that needs to be dealt with for
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Boxuan Zhai||Date: 2010-08-11 12:51:16|
|Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance|
|Previous:||From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig||Date: 2010-08-11 12:21:10|
|Subject: "micro bucket sort" ...|