Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>,PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug / shortcoming in has_*_privilege
Date: 2010-08-11 12:38:34
Message-ID: 20100811123834.GL26232@tamriel.snowman.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Nothing.  The only reason to use those forms is in a join against
> >> pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there.
> >
> > ISTM this bug should be on the open items list...
> 
> I don't think this is a bug.

Agreed, and it's certainly not something that needs to be dealt with for
9.0..

	Thanks,

		Stephen

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boxuan ZhaiDate: 2010-08-11 12:51:16
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Previous:From: Hans-Jürgen SchönigDate: 2010-08-11 12:21:10
Subject: "micro bucket sort" ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group