Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-07-02 20:53:44
Message-ID: 201007022053.o62Kri520462@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I would have liked to get to this for 9.0 but I feel it's a bit late
> >> now.
> 
> > What do we want to do about the above issue?
> 
> TODO item.

Added to TODO:

    Have autoanalyze of parent tables occur when child tables are modified

    * http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/AANLkTinx8lLTEKWcyEQ1rxVz6WMJVKNezfXW5TKnNAU6@mail.gmail.com 

I am surprised there is no documentation update requirement for this.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-02 20:58:45
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Previous:From: Rajesh Kumar MallahDate: 2010-07-02 19:53:03
Subject: Re: Extremely high CPU usage when building tables

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-02 20:58:45
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-02 20:52:08
Subject: Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group