Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date: 2010-06-30 23:23:01
Message-ID: 201006302323.o5UNN2L05846@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Rafael Martinez wrote:
> >> I am sending you a proposal with 13 diagrams to include in the manual so
> >> we can get an idea of how it will be. If it gets approved I will spend
> >> more time creating and including other diagrams and improving the build
> >> process for including figures into the manual.
>
> > Great!
>
> Where are the DIA sources for these? It's impossible to evaluate how
> maintainable these will be without seeing the source code.

OK, I put the dia sources online:

http://momjian.us/expire/pgsql-docs/dia/

They are XML files.

> > Also, there are two images that need to be updated for every major
> > release; is that something we want to commit to doing?
>
> -1 on that. The timeline thing is *certainly* not worth the maintenance
> effort, if indeed it even belongs in the docs at all (it looks more like
> marketing material). I think the lines-of-code diagram is not worth its
> keep either.

Sure, I can remove them, unless someone else wants to argue for their
inclusion.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-07-01 02:33:19 Re: typo in release note
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-06-30 23:16:23 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams