Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <rfusca(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Date: 2010-06-28 21:18:29
Message-ID: 201006282118.o5SLIUg16409@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > You could argue it either way.  The number of beta testers with
> > plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> > just changing the code without a catversion bump.  OTOH, if we want to
> > encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
> 
> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.

And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3.  :-)  Most fixes were related
to platform compile portability.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-06-28 22:54:16
Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-06-28 20:48:40
Subject: Re: Admission Control

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group