Josh Berkus wrote:
> > You could argue it either way. The number of beta testers with
> > plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> > just changing the code without a catversion bump. OTOH, if we want to
> > encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.
And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3. :-) Most fixes were related
to platform compile portability.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-06-28 22:54:16|
|Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-06-28 20:48:40|
|Subject: Re: Admission Control|