Re: Confusing Linux download page

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Confusing Linux download page
Date: 2010-06-16 20:45:10
Message-ID: 201006162045.o5GKjAL08139@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mi jun 16 16:23:58 -0400 2010:
> > Devrim G\xdcND\xdcZ wrote:
> > -- Start of PGP signed section.
> > > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 15:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > With the Command Prompt (CP) 8.4.4 debug/assert build problem reported
> > > > and fixed last week, how would someone identify they were using CP
> > > > RPMs, or yours?
> > >
> > > yum repo conf files show different URLs for the repos.
> >
> > But the RPM files themselves look the same? That seems confusing.
>
> Particularly so if they are being distributed through the FTP site ...
>
> Basically I see the status quo as there having been a fork of RPM
> generation, with neither side wanting to admit that there was a fork in
> the first place ...

Yeah, the bottom line is we can't continue like this indefinitely.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-06-16 20:52:43 Re: Confusing Linux download page
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-06-16 20:34:12 Re: Confusing Linux download page