Re: For update clause

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Florence Cousin <cousinflo(at)free(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: For update clause
Date: 2010-06-15 20:04:06
Message-ID: 201006152004.o5FK46616620@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Florence Cousin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am one of the french translators of the documentation. I am translating the
> reference page of SELECT, but I fail to understand this sentence about the FOR
> UPDATE clause ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-
> select.html#SQL-FOR-UPDATE-SHARE )
>
> ---------------
> In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the query snapshot
> will be locked, although they will not be returned if they have since been
> updated to not satisfy the query conditions.
> ------------------
>
> Could anyone please explain it to me, so that I can translate it properly? A
> word for word translation has really no meaning.

Wow, that is a confusing double-negative sentence. I have updated the
text to be:

In addition, rows that satisfied the query conditions as of the
query snapshot will be locked, although they will not be returned
if they were updated after the snapshot and no longer satisfy the
query conditions.

What it is saying is that SELECT FOR UPDATE will lock all rows that
match the SELECT query using the current snapshot, but the returned rows
might be different because the rows were changed after the snapshot was
taken, and a SELECT FOR UPDATE will return the rows as UPDATE will see
them, which might not match the SELECT snapshot. Yeah, it is confusing.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florence Cousin 2010-06-16 07:58:15 Re: For update clause
Previous Message Florence Cousin 2010-06-15 19:42:51 For update clause