Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-31 15:29:40
Message-ID: 201005311529.o4VFTep02459@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, but if we are going to have to honor "=>" eventually, shouldn't we
> > just do it now?  Supporting := and => seems confusing.
> 
> Personally, I haven't accepted the "if" part of that, therefore I
> feel no need to argue over the "then".

Right, I am asking about the "if" part.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-31 15:30:24
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2010-05-31 15:28:46
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group