Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-31 14:16:26
Message-ID: 201005311416.o4VEGQh11594@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> So as far as I can tell, no one is opposed to replacing "expr AS name"
> with "name := expr" in the named-parameter syntax.  Obviously we had
> better get this done before beta2.  Is anyone actually working on the
> code/docs changes?  If not, I'll pick it up.

If we eventually are going to want to support the ANSI standard "=>"
syntax, I am thinking we should just do it now.  The larger question is
what justification do we have of not supporting "=>".

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-05-31 14:26:00
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-05-31 14:14:06
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group