Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:53 PM, C?dric Villemain
> <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 2010/5/21 Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>:
> >> The original idea was that a trusted language does not allow an unprivileged
> >> user to gain access to any object or data, he does not have access to
> >> without that language.
> >> This does not include data transformation functionality, like string
> >> processing or the like. As long as the user had legitimate access to the
> >> input datum, then every derived form thereof is OK.
> > I find the current doc enough, add this prose from Jan as a comment
> > might help people perhaps.
> Yeah, Jan's description is very clear and to the point.
The attached, applied patch clarifies the meaning of "trusted language"
in the documentation using Jan's description.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
Description: text/x-diff (2.8 KB)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-05-30 02:33:16|
|Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH]: CRC32 is limiting at
COPY/CTAS/INSERT ... SELECT + speeding it up|
|Previous:||From: Tatsuo Ishii||Date: 2010-05-30 02:05:50|
|Subject: Re: pg_trgm|