Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-28 16:39:47
Message-ID: 201005281639.o4SGdlC28029@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Since former SQL Server / Sybase apps are the most likely to use named
> parameter notation in PostgreSQL, having a syntax which could be ported
> using only "sed" would be nice.
>
> Relevant to the whole discussion, though ... is the conflicting SQL
> standard syntax something we're every likely to implement?

Not sure, but I assume people could be using the AS syntax in other
databases (for the inheritance usage) and then trying to use it in our
database.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-05-28 16:45:44 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-05-28 16:34:16 pgsql: PGDLLEXPORT is __declspec (dllexport) only on MSVC, but is