Why don't you use a partition?
Create another table that inherits from the table and add your new constraints
to the new table.
On Thursday 27 May 2010 19:32:33 Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Iñigo Martinez Lasala
> <imartinez(at)vectorsf(dot)com> wrote:
> > Constraints are special triggers, but triggers anyway.
> > So, If you truncate the table, create the contraint and then restore with
> > triggers disabled, it could be faster that create the contraint and wait
> > until it checks all table data... or not... :)
> > How would disabling triggers help that ? He just wants to add
> > constraints without loss of data. I don't think he has any triggers.
> I agree constraints are triggers. But as far as I know, truncating
> table doesn't disable the constraints.
> Its same as deleteing all rows and then altering the table.
> In that manner, even my solution would be appropriate because it
> creates a duplicate table with the constraints.
> Whatever be the method, I don't think its possible to avoid the
> constraints. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Robert Voinea <robert (dot) voinea (at) topex (dot) ro>
Phone: +40 21 408 38 00 / ext. 343
Fax: +40 21 408 38 08
Local time: GMT+2
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Iñigo Martinez Lasala||Date: 2010-05-28 07:43:04|
|Subject: Re: About "Context-switch storm" problem|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-05-28 00:42:09|
|Subject: Re: List traffic |