Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Robert Haas wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> > Francisco Reyes wrote:
> >> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level that we should mention
> >> >> > it, but you are right on the floodgates issue. ?We do aleady mention
> >> >> > many other replication solutions in other sections, so I didn't think
> >> >>
> >> >> Then perhaps all that is needed is to just link to the replication section
> >> >> of the wiki:
> >> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pool
> >> >> ing
> >> >>
> >> >> A search for replication on the top of the doc page (ie
> >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/index.html) takes to the high
> >> >> availability page, so a reference there to the wiki page may be a good idea.
> >> >
> >> > That is an excellent idea, not only for replication, but there are
> >> > probably other wiki pages that we should link to from our main docs. ?I
> >> > will go through the wiki, find appropriate pages, and add links from our
> >> > docs.
> >> I don't know that I'm eager to link from our docs to the wiki. ?That
> >> seems likely to lead to maintenance headaches. ?But on the other hand,
> >> I see no problem mentioning third-party products that are part of the
> >> PG ecosystem.
> > Well, the problem is that we have more solutions that fit in the docs in
> > normal places.
> Isn't that just a matter of rejiggering the page formatting a little bit?
The point is that there is a lot of replication information I don't want
to merge into that SGML page so even if we mention "Londiste", the wiki
reference is still useful. I have the same problem with mentioning
pooling in the docs --- there is no natural place to put it, but I can
reference the wiki from the performance SGML docs.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
In response to
- Re: Londiste at 2010-05-27 21:07:53 from Stefan Kaltenbrunner
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-05-27 07:56:57|
|Subject: Re: documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-05-27 01:42:18|
|Subject: Re: Londiste|