| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby |
| Date: | 2010-05-12 16:37:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20100512163715.GB2860@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The server's messages and the documentation uses all of these terms in
> mixed ways. Maybe we could decide on some preferred terminology and
> adjust the existing texts. Ideas?
How about origin/subscriber? More descriptive than primary/secondary,
and less tied to a particular model of interaction.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-12 16:39:53 | Re: primary/secondary/master/slave/standby |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-05-12 16:33:53 | primary/secondary/master/slave/standby |