Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ECPG pointer vs array

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG pointer vs array
Date: 2010-03-31 11:14:24
Message-ID: 20100331111424.GB19061@feivel.credativ.lan (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:37:13AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> It would be good if libecpg to support e.g. "char **strings" instead of
> "char *strings[]" for preallocated strings and the array of those.
> ...

I'm open to improvements. The way ecpg accesses variables hasn't been changed
for ages, just new types got added. 

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2010-03-31 11:15:20
Subject: Re: Problems with variable cursorname in ecpg
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2010-03-31 11:13:00
Subject: Re: Problems with variable cursorname in ecpg

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group