| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes |
| Date: | 2010-03-22 17:25:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20100322172515.GF26428@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:47:37PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 09:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
>
> > > Yes, for most people touching != overlap. So it just looks like a
> > > bug.
> >
> > I don't know which people you've surveyed, but at least in my math
> > classes, one point in common was sufficient for an overlap. I'd be
> > happy to write up something that makes this clear.
>
> If you're happy to document it, good, thanks.
I'm seeing a lot of places where this might be documented. Any ideas
as to which ones are appropriate?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-22 17:46:51 | Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-22 16:47:37 | Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes |