Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
Date: 2010-03-11 01:39:37
Message-ID: 201003110139.o2B1dba20349@momjian.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the
> > query cancel problem. ?It really seems to me that this is the way
> > forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation
> > rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.
> 
> Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample?
> Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it
> in the conf file.

I asked about that last week and for some reason Simon didn't want it
added and Greg Smith was going to get this corrected.  Greg?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-11 05:29:45
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-03-11 01:12:44
Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group