Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > I've been playing with vacuum_defer_cleanup_age in reference to the
> > query cancel problem. ?It really seems to me that this is the way
> > forward in terms of dealing with query cancel for normal operation
> > rather than wal_standby_delay, or maybe in combination with it.
> Why isn't vacuum_defer_cleanup_age listed on postgresql.conf.sample?
> Though I also tried to test the effect of it, I was unable to find it
> in the conf file.
I asked about that last week and for some reason Simon didn't want it
added and Greg Smith was going to get this corrected. Greg?
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-03-11 05:29:45|
|Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints |
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-03-11 01:12:44|
|Subject: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag error on 9.0 alpha 4|