Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:23:14
Message-ID: 201003011723.14495.pgsql@bluepolka.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by
> >> itself or starting a token, it might possibly cause
> >> something like this.
> >
> > There is one, looks like a typo got in.  How do I fix it?
> 
> Hmm, a user named @, or what?

Yes, a bogus user: 

"@" "" ""

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:25:37
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:25:37
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group