On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by
> >> itself or starting a token, it might possibly cause
> >> something like this.
> >
> > There is one, looks like a typo got in.  How do I fix it?
> 
> Hmm, a user named @, or what?

Yes, a bogus user: 

"@" "" ""

In response to

• Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) at 2010-03-02 00:18:31 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) at 2010-03-02 00:25:37 from Ed L.
• Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) at 2010-03-02 00:26:30 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Ed L.	Date: 2010-03-02 00:25:37
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Ed L.	Date: 2010-03-02 00:25:37
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)