On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 17:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:>
> >
> >> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it
> >> looks like the thing thinks it is processing an include
> >> file.  Are there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?
> >
> > Yes, indeed, there are many.  My user names are "user(at)host"
> > form, and have been for years.  Would that be a problem now?
> 
> user(at)host shouldn't be a problem, but if there were an @ by
>  itself or starting a token, it might possibly cause something
>  like this.

There is one, looks like a typo got in.  How do I fix it?

In response to

• Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) at 2010-03-02 00:15:36 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9) at 2010-03-02 00:18:31 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:15:36
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:18:31
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-02 00:15:36
	Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)