Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

From: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Date: 2010-03-02 00:05:21
Message-ID: 201003011705.21393.pgsql@bluepolka.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Monday 01 March 2010 @ 16:57, Tom Lane wrote:> 
> Now that I look more closely at those line numbers, it looks
>  like the thing thinks it is processing an include file.  Are
>  there any @ signs in your global/pg_auth file?

Yes, indeed, there are many.  My user names are "user(at)host" form, 
and have been for years.  Would that be a problem now?

Ed

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-03-02 00:08:05
Subject: Re: [Feature request] variable declaration of anonymous composite data type in PL/pgSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-01 23:57:24
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Ed L.Date: 2010-03-02 00:12:36
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-01 23:57:24
Subject: Re: Hung postmaster (8.3.9)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group