Tom Lane wrote:
> I just committed a backpatch of
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-05/msg00229.php
> to 8.3.  As in that patch, I did not try to manually reindent the code
> that's now wrapped in PG_TRY blocks.  It might be a good idea to run
> pgindent on just that one file so that it's spacing-consistent with
> the later branches.  This will ease any future backpatching in that
> file.

Sure, I can easily do that, but I am not sure how to generate a typedef
list for that release, except to use the old typedef collection method
for that file.  Is that OK?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  PG East:  http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do

In response to

• Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch? at 2010-03-01 02:27:53 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch? at 2010-03-01 03:46:19 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-03-01 03:46:19
	Subject: Re: Could we do pgindent on just utils/adt/xml.c in the 8.3 branch?
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-03-01 03:12:22
	Subject: Re: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration