Tom Lane wrote:
> I observe that the Notes section here
> has turned into a disorganized laundry list of unrelated items,
> ranging from quite-subtle issues to barely-useful-even-to-novices
> advice (do we really need "Use DROP FUNCTION to remove user-defined
> functions" here? Especially given the See Also link later on?).
> I don't have an immediate proposal what to do about it, but it seems
> like it could use some effort. Any thoughts?
Yea, it is hard to read. What I did was to move some items up into
their proper sections, and add an "Overloading" heading. You can see
the results here:
and a patch is attached.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-02-27 03:41:36|
|Subject: Re: libpq-example.html needs to use <> includes|
|Previous:||From: gabrielle||Date: 2010-02-25 19:27:37|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] log_statement docs|