Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date: 2010-02-26 18:25:04
Message-ID: 201002261825.o1QIP4525584@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Log Message:
> > > > -----------
> > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > > previous patch.
> > >
> > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,
>
> The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points

We don't usually modify past release notes.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-26 18:37:19 Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-26 18:20:48 Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert