Re: Large fixed-width text

I would like to close out this issue. Can we get whatever improvements
we can make implemented in our web site, even if it is only comment
additions?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > Oh, ok, I know they affect mail body in archives and all I said is true -
> > > they are overwritten by other rules in most browsers and the text is huge in
> > > browsers where they're not overwritten. I think better default would be
> > > 120%, it may still look big somewhere but not as big as it does now and it
> > > compensates for that monospace vs normal font default size.
> >
> > Just to take this off on a slight tangent... You seem pretty
> > well-versed in CSS, right? ;) Any chance we can convince you to try to
> > do some cleanup work on our CSS, structuring it nicer and also getting
> > some comments in there so us mere mortals can understand it? That
> > would be a *very* welcome piece of help!
> >
> > If you are, please contact me off-list before you start actually
> > working, I have some partial pieces of work you'll be interested in
> > :-)
>
> Yes, please. I just finished reading a book about CSS so I understand
> the syntax, but obviously not the historical quirks. I would like to be
> involved as well.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +