Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan p??e v po 08. 02. 2010 v 20:07 -0500:
> > Our Solaris *moth members seem to have stopped building. Have we lost them?
> Hi Andrew,
> The answer is not simple. Yes, we lost Solaris 8 and 9 machines which
> was reinstalled and now they are used for different purpose. It was
> planned before the April and I announced it long time ago. It
> unfortunately happed and timing looks strange. And I did not find
> I have replacement for nevada/x86 machine already, but I need to setup
> it which is one item in my very long TODO list :(. Solaris 10 Sparc/x86
> and nevada sparc are covered at this moment.
I think we have to accept the inevitable result that Postgres support on
Solaris is going to diminish over time. We certainly are going to get
less support from Sun/Oracle, and one day the use of Postgres might even
be obstructed on Solaris or void software support contracts.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-02-16 17:11:24|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL::PLPerl::Call - Simple interface for calling SQL functions from PostgreSQL PL/Perl|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-02-16 16:35:30|
|Subject: Re: Explain buffers display units.|