Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The dictionary data could be shared or minimally dictionary could be
> preloaded like some PL language.
> What do you think about this?
Surely preloading is the most realistic approach, but I hope we would support
dynamic allocation of shared memory, and load dictionaries in the area and
share it with backends. We should avoid additonal calls of shmget() or mmap()
in the additional shared memory allocation, but we can shrink shared buffers
and reuse the area for general purposes. We often have serveral GB of shared
buffers nowadays, so dividing some MB of buffers will not be problem.
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-02-16 00:58:05|
|Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2010-02-16 00:37:39|
|Subject: Re: Explain buffers display units.|