Tom Lane escribió:
> Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> writes:
> > Searching the archives ain't helping me refresh those memories. So it
> > seems the case for an extended opclass infrastructure, or a new side
> > one, is between thin an non-existent yet?
> Yeah, I don't immediately see anything that would justify going to
> that level of effort. Adding +/- as support functions for btree
> seems like the thing to do.
Would it work to use a fake access method instead? If we add it to
btree, will we be able to backtrack and move that to a separate catalog
if we ever determine that it would have been better?
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2010-02-12 15:50:30|
|Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-12 15:49:16|
|Subject: Re: Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)|