Robert Haas escribió:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas escribió:
> >> I was all prepared to admit that I hadn't actually looked at the patch
> >> carefully enough, but I just looked at (and CVS HEAD) again and what
> >> you've written here doesn't appear to describe what I'm seeing in the
> >> code:
> >> if ((portal->strategy != PORTAL_ONE_SELECT) && (!portal->holdStore))
> >> FillPortalStore(portal, isTopLevel);
> >> So one of us is confused... it may well be me.
> > Ah, it seems I misread it ... but then I don't quite see the point in
> > that change.
> Well the point is just that Zoltan is adding some more code that
> applies to both branches of the switch, so merging them saves some
But then there's no other branches, so why not just put it below the
> > Well, not doing a full review anyway, so never mind me.
> Actually I was sort of hoping you (or someone other than me) would
> pick this up for commit...
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-11 19:50:42|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-02-11 19:46:37|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove old-style VACUUM FULL
(which was known for a little while|