Tom Lane escribió:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >>> We can still hope that some feedback comes in during beta.
> >> I'm not opposed to that in principal, but in practice the PGadmin
> >> folks may not like us very much if we change things too drastically if
> >> they've got it working the way we had it... we'll just have to see
> >> what reports we get, I suppose.
> > We're not planning to reimplement our existing parser for this release
> > so it won't bother us if you want to bash about any of the new
> > formats.
> Well, you're going to have to do more than zero work even with that
> plan, given the changes already made to the text format. It would be
> really nice if we could get some feedback on the non-text formats
> *before* they're set in stone.
Is Redhat's Visual Explain still alive? And what about Tom Raney's stuff?
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Priit Laes||Date: 2010-02-10 17:01:19|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Output configuration status after
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-02-10 16:56:36|
|Subject: Re: Some belated patch review for "Buffers" explain analyze patch|