Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
> > The documentation has definitely improved from the last time Robert
> > looked at it, but I fear it still needs some more work. I'm willing to
> > do that work, but I need something concrete.
> It seems to me documentation is required to get into the source tree
> before beta, and as we see with some other patches it's definitely the
> case even with our newer procedures that some code gets in without its
> documentation properly finished. I guess this amounts to the commiter
> willing to fill up the docs later on.
Eh? Previously we allowed code to go in with documentation to be
written after feature freeze. Is this no longer acceptable?
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-02-08 15:31:57|
|Subject: Re: damage control mode|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-08 15:15:47|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Create a "relation mapping" infrastructure to support changing |