Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> Barring objections I'm going to press ahead with completing and
> >> committing this; then in a separate patch remove VACUUM FULL INPLACE.
> > Was it our determination that we could remove VFI if we eliminated the
> > system catalogs? I'm fine with it, I just thought some people had a
> > marginal use case for VFI.
> I thought the consensus was to remove it if possible. There may still
> be some "marginal" use cases, but they don't justify the work that'd
> be needed to make it play safely with HS; let alone fixing the other
> longstanding gotchas with it, like the double-commit risk.
Oh, yea, I remember, HS killed it because of the work required to make
FULL work for 9.0. Thanks.
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-02-05 23:18:51|
|Subject: Re: archive_timeout behavior for no activity|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-05 22:34:23|
|Subject: Re: WIP patch for system-catalog vacuuming via a relation map |