Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:41 PM, Randy Isbell <jisbell(at)cisco(dot)com> wrote:
> > An inconsistency exists between the segment name reported by
> > pg_stop_backup() and the actual WAL file name.
> >
> > START WAL LOCATION: 10/FE1E2BAC (file 0000000200000010000000FE)
> > STOP WAL LOCATION: 10/FF000000 (file 0000000200000010000000FF)
> But it was rejected because its change might break the existing app.
It might break existing applications if it returns "FE" instead of "FF",
but never-used filename surprises users. (IMO, the existing apps probably
crash if "FF" returned, i.e, 1/256 of the time.)
Should it return the *next* reasonable log filename instead of "FF"?
For example, 000000020000002000000000 for the above case.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
Responses
pgsql-docs by date
| Next: | From: Fujii Masao | Date: 2010-02-05 00:54:14 |
| Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION |
| Previous: | From: Bruce Momjian | Date: 2010-02-04 16:04:58 |
| Subject: Re: Administration book proofreading |
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Fujii Masao | Date: 2010-02-05 00:54:14 |
| Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION |
| Previous: | From: Tom Lane | Date: 2010-02-04 23:53:46 |
| Subject: pg_class has no toast table? |
pgsql-bugs by date
| Next: | From: Fujii Masao | Date: 2010-02-05 00:54:14 |
| Subject: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4566: pg_stop_backup() reports incorrect STOP WAL LOCATION |
| Previous: | From: Mark Kirkwood | Date: 2010-02-04 23:21:12 |
| Subject: Re: BUG #5312: I NEED HELP |