Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-02-03 18:36:13
Message-ID: 20100203183613.GE3905@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> The argument for doing this now hinges solely on a marketing-driven
> choice of version name, and not on any actual evidence that applications
> are ready for it. We really need to do this at the start of a devel
> and alpha test cycle, not at the end.

Application writers probably didn't bother all that much with alphas
though. The bulk of them is going to start with the betas, which have
not been delivered yet, so it seems a good time to try.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-02-03 18:37:14 Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-03 18:33:42 Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL