Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-02-03 18:36:13
Message-ID: 20100203183613.GE3905@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> The argument for doing this now hinges solely on a marketing-driven
> choice of version name, and not on any actual evidence that applications
> are ready for it.  We really need to do this at the start of a devel
> and alpha test cycle, not at the end.

Application writers probably didn't bother all that much with alphas
though.  The bulk of them is going to start with the betas, which have
not been delivered yet, so it seems a good time to try.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-02-03 18:37:14
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-02-03 18:33:42
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group