On Friday 29 January 2010 23:47:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help,
> > > > at all.
> > >
> > > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This
> > > is a work item, and not a small one.
> > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in
> > 9.1?
> You mean turned on by default, right?
Obviously, yes ;-)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Cédric Villemain||Date: 2010-01-30 01:08:26|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-30 00:05:38|
|Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown|