Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-30 00:31:18
Message-ID: 201001300131.32733.andres@anarazel.de (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 29 January 2010 23:47:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help,
> > > > at all.
> > > 
> > > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items.  This
> > > is a work item, and not a small one.
> > 
> > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in
> > 9.1?
> 
> You mean turned on by default, right?
Obviously, yes ;-)

Andres

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Cédric VillemainDate: 2010-01-30 01:08:26
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-30 00:05:38
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group