On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > all.
> The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This
> is a work item, and not a small one.
What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2010-01-29 22:47:22|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-29 22:44:47|
|Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |